Identify a problem in your organization or industry that can be explored or improved through a 21st-century leadership theory. You can use the problem you identified in your Week 1 assignment, or you can choose a different problem.

 

Write a 525- to 700-word analysis that includes the following:

Describe the organizational problem.
Describe the theory of leadership selected in relationship to an organizational problem using the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader model.
Explain how the leadership theory might help mitigate the identified organizational problem.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

The Problem of Siloed Communication in the Modern Healthcare System

The healthcare industry, despite its technological advancements, continues to struggle with a significant organizational problem: siloed communication. This issue manifests in various ways, from fragmented patient records across different departments and providers to a lack of effective interprofessional collaboration. This fragmentation leads to inefficiencies, medical errors, and compromised patient safety. Specifically, in a large hospital system, we observe a lack of seamless communication between the emergency department (ED), inpatient units, and outpatient clinics. This results in duplicated testing, delayed diagnoses, and inconsistent care plans, ultimately impacting patient outcomes and increasing costs.  

To address this challenge, we can leverage Distributed Leadership, a 21st-century leadership theory that emphasizes shared responsibility and collaborative decision-making. This theory moves away from the traditional hierarchical model and acknowledges that leadership can emerge from various individuals and teams within an organization. It focuses on empowering individuals at all levels to contribute their expertise and take ownership of their roles, particularly in communication and collaboration.  

Distributed Leadership and the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader Model:

Applying the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader model to Distributed Leadership within our hospital context involves a multi-faceted approach:

  • Scholar: As scholars, healthcare leaders must critically analyze the existing communication structures and identify the root causes of the siloed environment. This requires researching best practices in interprofessional communication, exploring the impact of technology on information sharing, and understanding the psychological and sociological factors that influence collaboration. This involves data collection through patient surveys, staff interviews, and analysis of communication protocols to identify areas of weakness. The scholar also needs to stay abreast of current research on distributed leadership and its application in complex organizations like healthcare.
  • Practitioner: As practitioners, leaders must implement strategies to foster a culture of shared responsibility and collaborative communication. This involves creating cross-functional teams, implementing shared electronic health record (EHR) systems that facilitate seamless information exchange, and providing training on effective communication and conflict resolution. They will create platforms for interdepartmental meetings, case conferences, and multidisciplinary rounds. For example, implementing a shared online platform where all patient related information is updated in real time, and is accessible by all relevant hospital staff, is a practical application of the practitioner aspect. The practitioner also takes the learned theory, and puts it into practical action, and adapts it to the specific needs of the organization.

The Problem of Siloed Communication in the Modern Healthcare System

The healthcare industry, despite its technological advancements, continues to struggle with a significant organizational problem: siloed communication. This issue manifests in various ways, from fragmented patient records across different departments and providers to a lack of effective interprofessional collaboration. This fragmentation leads to inefficiencies, medical errors, and compromised patient safety. Specifically, in a large hospital system, we observe a lack of seamless communication between the emergency department (ED), inpatient units, and outpatient clinics. This results in duplicated testing, delayed diagnoses, and inconsistent care plans, ultimately impacting patient outcomes and increasing costs.  

To address this challenge, we can leverage Distributed Leadership, a 21st-century leadership theory that emphasizes shared responsibility and collaborative decision-making. This theory moves away from the traditional hierarchical model and acknowledges that leadership can emerge from various individuals and teams within an organization. It focuses on empowering individuals at all levels to contribute their expertise and take ownership of their roles, particularly in communication and collaboration.  

Distributed Leadership and the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader Model:

Applying the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader model to Distributed Leadership within our hospital context involves a multi-faceted approach:

  • Scholar: As scholars, healthcare leaders must critically analyze the existing communication structures and identify the root causes of the siloed environment. This requires researching best practices in interprofessional communication, exploring the impact of technology on information sharing, and understanding the psychological and sociological factors that influence collaboration. This involves data collection through patient surveys, staff interviews, and analysis of communication protocols to identify areas of weakness. The scholar also needs to stay abreast of current research on distributed leadership and its application in complex organizations like healthcare.
  • Practitioner: As practitioners, leaders must implement strategies to foster a culture of shared responsibility and collaborative communication. This involves creating cross-functional teams, implementing shared electronic health record (EHR) systems that facilitate seamless information exchange, and providing training on effective communication and conflict resolution. They will create platforms for interdepartmental meetings, case conferences, and multidisciplinary rounds. For example, implementing a shared online platform where all patient related information is updated in real time, and is accessible by all relevant hospital staff, is a practical application of the practitioner aspect. The practitioner also takes the learned theory, and puts it into practical action, and adapts it to the specific needs of the organization.
  • Leader: As leaders, they must champion the shift towards a distributed leadership model by empowering individuals to take ownership of communication and collaboration. This requires fostering a culture of trust, transparency, and psychological safety, where individuals feel comfortable sharing information and raising concerns. Leaders must also act as facilitators, promoting open dialogue and ensuring that all voices are heard. This includes recognizing and rewarding individuals and teams who demonstrate effective communication and collaboration. The leader also needs to ensure that the distributed leadership model is sustainable, and continues to be effective.  

Mitigating Siloed Communication with Distributed Leadership:

Distributed Leadership can help mitigate the problem of siloed communication in several ways:

  • Enhanced Interprofessional Collaboration: By empowering individuals at all levels to contribute their expertise, Distributed Leadership fosters a culture of collaboration and shared decision-making. This can lead to more comprehensive and coordinated care plans, reducing the risk of medical errors and improving patient outcomes.  
  • Improved Information Sharing: By promoting open communication and utilizing shared information systems, Distributed Leadership facilitates the seamless exchange of patient information across different departments and providers. This can reduce duplication of testing, improve diagnostic accuracy, and streamline care transitions.
  • Increased Staff Engagement and Ownership: By empowering individuals to take ownership of their roles in communication and collaboration, Distributed Leadership can increase staff engagement and motivation. This can lead to a more positive work environment and improved staff satisfaction.  
  • Increased Agility and Responsiveness: Distributed leadership enables faster response times to patient needs. When all members of the team are empowered to make decisions and communicate effectively, the organization is more agile and responsive to patient needs.
  • Reduced Medical Errors: The increase in communication and collaboration that is seen with distributed leadership, greatly reduces the likelyhood of medical errors.

By embracing Distributed Leadership and applying the Scholar-Practitioner-Leader model, healthcare organizations can effectively address the problem of siloed communication and create a more integrated, patient-centered, and efficient healthcare system.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer