1, Are you surprised by anything that is said on this website?
- Why do you think many people are so quick to believe reported statistics?
- Give some examples of instances where you often see statistics taken out of context. (search the Internet for other examples and explain why you think they are out of context).
Quote: “In America, more preschoolers are shot dead each year (82 in 2013) than police officers are in the line of duty (27 in 2013), according to figures from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the FBI”
- Point out as many possible flaws with this statement.
Think of the ways you would lie with statistics to further an agenda. Now keep in mind, for the sake of this assignment, the numbers reported are correct, but that does not mean they represent the whole picture or that the quote is meaningful in a way beyond comparing two numbers.
and insulting in the direction of girl porn-people, who frequently pick out to comply with that mode of subsistence. The selections of porn-people deserve as plenty appreciate as those of girls running in much less stigmatized industries and, perhaps, even greater feminist unity. seasoned-censorship argumentation has a tendency to revolve around rhetorical gadgets. the first is the exaggeration of the quantity and degree of violence contained in pornographic cloth, through the accumulation of undeniably worrying pictures. The slide shows projected in WAVPM meetings and the material articulately defined in Dworkin’s book have been handpicked for his or her shock-fee and energy to disturb. Drawn ordinarily from the underground cultures of bizarre, Bestiality and SM, most of these images are largely unrepresentative of the mainstream market, that is both exceedingly assorted and specialised. Specialization is a key-point because of the simple reality that distinctive humans have special ‘turn-ons’. for the reason that some human beings may also discover publicly worrying, what others view as privately stimulating isn't any desirable purpose to label porn in its entirety as intrinsically offensive. the second one rhetorical tool lies within the argument that pornography is not just a representation of imaginary violence but also a recorded truth or as placed by using MacKinnon, a ‘documentary of abuse’. once more this argument misleadingly conflates fact with representational myth. to claim that every girl -or guy- that looks to be abused in a porn-film is surely abused, is sort of as naïve as claiming that each man shot-dead in, say, ‘the Terminator’, is definitely dead. The anti-porn argument fails to think about elements which include artifice, acting and function-gambling. whilst proper case of abuse aren't absent from the porn industry, the considerable majority of depictions of ‘violence’ occur in a position-gambling context which carefully ensures the safety of the actors. My view is that understanding pornography requires a descriptive definition which, instead of passing judgments over the moral credentials and political recognition of its individuals, focuses on the realities of the porn enterprise. on this light, contemporary pornography, as we are aware of it, is the picture representation of sexually express fabric, 759af83dbac04511979469e6f58100a3 and mass-fed on with the motive of sexual arousal. even though it isn't ‘intrinsically evil’, this enterprise is morally no higher than the society that produces it. The impact of sexually specific cloth on its viewers and society at massive is the second one fundamental component of the pornography debate. Anti-porn evaluation has insisted on a concept of causality, wherein real rape, physical abuse and humiliation of women by means of men arise as an immediate end result of their exposure to the ‘hateful values’ of pornography. In Dworkin’s own words ‘at the coronary heart of the female situation is pornography: it's miles the ideology this is the source of all of the rest;’. by means of equating the representation of violence with injurious motion, Dworkin inspires what neo-Aristotelian theorists of illustration have termed as the ‘Mimesis-model’. Derived from the Greek phrase ‘mimesis’, meaning ‘imitation’ or ‘replica’, the model positions the actual each before and after its representation.>GET ANSWER