Go to http://www.people-press.org/quiz/political-typology/
and go to the “Take the Typology Quiz” in center of the page to determines your political ideological viewpoint. Even if you are a student from another country, take the survey and answer the questions as best as you can.
Once you have taken the survey, do the following:
1) Explain where you fit in the various typologies listed by explaining the definition of the typology you were place in. Very important to explain which characteristics listed in your typology that do not represent your views and those which do? (40 points)
2) Were you surprised by the survey results, why and why not. Please elaborate. In doing so reflect on any previous political activity you engaged in that helped you to see yourself in the assessed category? Even having a discussion with family members or friends is considered political engagement (20 points)
3) Where do you believe you got most of your views (which socialization agents)? Socialization agents are things like family members, religious beliefs that define a personal moral code, public school experience, civic groups you may have joined, media, and friends. (40 points)
4) Read the PowerPoint file “The Political Culture of Texas” and extrapolate from where you were placed on the Pew typology listing and your views about politics (or lack of a view) and the different American political cultures. Explain the political culture(s) that tend(s) to reflect your values and beliefs (individualistic, traditionalistic, moralistic).
while a fixed of frameworks complement and construct on every other, the delineation of the concept focuses heavily on vertical versus horizontal dimensions in a time-sliced style. this is, time measurement in responsibility has now not been of number one significance. but, it's far really worth noting that the time size is closely interrelated with a series of conceptual differences made in previous literature, and it can cowl complementary components of the query concerning two sequential strains represented by way of administrative obligation as opposed to political accountability. First, the site of duty actors relies upon on the time dimension. Civil servants typically have longer phrases to serve the public interest over the long time. at the same time, they're responsible to the elected representatives of the public who generally tend to have “a restrained time horizon” and “decide on guidelines that yield tangible blessings for elements in the near time period” (Posner, 2004: 137). for that reason, the priorities expressed by using elected officers can be a ways greater associated with short-term issues and temporal problems rather than lengthy-term answers, while bba0dbeb6a5d3c2fa0d3f365b4817df5 types of civil carrier employees could prioritize sustainable solutions to cozy a protracted-term attitude of the citizens, both present day and within the destiny. 2d, the time frame is vital to distinguishing between most important streams of responsibility. duty mechanisms attention predominantly on retroactive accountability for the past consequences, at the same time as duty as a virtue takes a proactive approach to making sure moral behaviors within the future. The timeline is likewise useful to distinguishing between ex ante responsibility of the choice-making technique main as much as the decision and ex submit duty wherein the consequences to be had from the choice already taken or where questions of compliance are diagnosed and addressed. In different words, ex ante responsibility refers to being chargeable for the selection earlier than an administrator act, while ex submit responsibility is suggestive of conditions in which directors are liable for the final results of their selections. as an example, the focus of conventional bureaucratic management is very a whole lot on input-orientated legitimacy before the implementation of the coverage (Scharpf, 1999). In contrast, the development of an responsibility mechanism in the NPM reforms has greatly relied on ex publish effects-orientated mechanisms. 1/3, the time horizon determines the availability between duty mechanisms and responsibility distinctive feature enhancement. a formal mechanism of duty calls for brief-time period results as it relies upon largely on clarity of measurable standards of performance with certainly described roles and consequences. however, in many situations, the lag between choices or movements and their last results introduces troubles of hazard and uncertainty (Mashaw, 2014). The longer the time horizon, the much less accurate such a mechanism turns into. at the opposite, the normative realm of responsibility is well ideal for the assessment of problems of uncertainty in continuous time. As a normative guideline, it is able to repeat itself past one size of time and gather through the years. overlooked time size in accountability and monetary duty for the reason that brief-term measurement of accountability is susceptible to administrative responsibility, responsibility-as-mechanism, and managerial responsibility, the absence of time dimens>GET ANSWER