Describe your experience in the utilization of nursing research in your clinical practice.

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

My experience in the utilization of nursing research in clinical practice has been a continuous journey of growth and adaptation, driven by the commitment to provide evidence-based care. While the ideal of seamlessly integrating every new research finding into daily routines can be challenging, I’ve found that actively engaging with research significantly enhances patient outcomes and professional satisfaction.

One of the most direct ways I’ve utilized nursing research is in pain management strategies. Early in my career, traditional pain assessment often relied solely on numerical scales. However, through engaging with research articles on the multidimensional nature of pain (e.g., exploring psychological, social, and spiritual aspects beyond just intensity), I began to incorporate more holistic assessment tools. For example, studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions like guided imagery, music therapy, or even simply focused distraction for post-operative pain or chronic conditions, led me to advocate for and implement these alongside medication. I recall a specific instance with a patient recovering from extensive orthopedic surgery. Traditional pain medications weren’t fully alleviating their discomfort. Recalling research

My experience in the utilization of nursing research in clinical practice has been a continuous journey of growth and adaptation, driven by the commitment to provide evidence-based care. While the ideal of seamlessly integrating every new research finding into daily routines can be challenging, I’ve found that actively engaging with research significantly enhances patient outcomes and professional satisfaction.

One of the most direct ways I’ve utilized nursing research is in pain management strategies. Early in my career, traditional pain assessment often relied solely on numerical scales. However, through engaging with research articles on the multidimensional nature of pain (e.g., exploring psychological, social, and spiritual aspects beyond just intensity), I began to incorporate more holistic assessment tools. For example, studies on the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions like guided imagery, music therapy, or even simply focused distraction for post-operative pain or chronic conditions, led me to advocate for and implement these alongside medication. I recall a specific instance with a patient recovering from extensive orthopedic surgery. Traditional pain medications weren’t fully alleviating their discomfort. Recalling research

on the synergistic effect of combined therapies, I collaborated with the patient and their family to introduce specific relaxation techniques and music therapy, which significantly improved their reported pain levels and overall well-being, leading to a faster recovery and reduced reliance on opioids. This direct application of research moved beyond rote practice, allowing for more individualized and effective care.

Another significant area has been in wound care management. The field of wound care is constantly evolving with new dressings, techniques, and understanding of the wound healing process. I’ve frequently consulted nursing research to inform my decisions on the most appropriate dressing type for various wound etiologies, from pressure injuries to surgical wounds. For example, research distinguishing the benefits of moist wound healing over traditional dry dressings revolutionized my practice. I actively sought out and applied evidence on hydrocolloid dressings for partial-thickness wounds or alginate dressings for highly exudative wounds, directly impacting healing rates and reducing patient discomfort. I remember a particularly challenging chronic venous leg ulcer. Initial conventional treatments showed minimal progress. After reviewing recent systematic reviews on compression therapy efficacy and novel biofilm management strategies, I adjusted the care plan to include higher compression gradients and specific topical agents aimed at disrupting biofilm, leading to granulation tissue formation and eventual closure after weeks of stagnation. This wasn’t a “one-size-fits-all” approach but rather a nuanced application of current evidence to a complex clinical problem.

Furthermore, nursing research has profoundly influenced my approach to patient education and health promotion. Understanding the determinants of health behaviors and the most effective communication strategies to promote adherence to treatment plans or preventive measures is critical. I’ve leveraged research on motivational interviewing techniques and health literacy principles to tailor my educational sessions. For instance, studies highlighting the impact of simple, clear language and visual aids on patient comprehension directly informed how I explain medication regimens or disease processes to diverse patient populations, ensuring better understanding and empowering them to take a more active role in their health. In community health settings, research on community-based health interventions for chronic disease prevention has guided my involvement in initiatives promoting healthy lifestyles, moving beyond individual patient encounters to address public health challenges at a broader level.

Challenges, however, are inherent in this process. Time constraints, limited access to full-text articles, and the sheer volume of new research can be overwhelming. There’s also the gap between research findings and their practical implementation in resource-limited settings or within established protocols. Despite these hurdles, my ongoing commitment to utilizing nursing research is driven by the conviction that it is fundamental to providing the highest quality, most effective, and compassionate care to my patients. It’s an essential tool for continuous professional development and for elevating the standards of nursing practice.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer