‘view which [she] may have of the matter,’

  As interviewer, Thrace must may make a decision which invokes or is otherwise connected to an existing personal ‘view which [she] may have of the matter,’ and that ‘might reasonably be thought’ to provide the foundation of an irreconcilable conflict. Consequently, Thrace’s active participation in both proceedings may lead a ‘fair-minded observer’ to find that she holds ‘a frame of mind…incompatible with the…neutrality required to weigh legal, factual and policy considerations’ as demanded by the Act.