Working Hard at Being Fair
City Mortgage is a medium-sized mortgage company that employs about 25 people. Jenny Hernandez, who has been with the company for 10 years, is the production manager, overseeing its day-to-day operations.
Reporting to Jenny are loan originators (salespeople), closing officers, mortgage underwriters, and processing and shipping personnel. Jenny is proud of the company and feels as if she has contributed substantially to its steady growth and expansion.
The climate at City Mortgage is very positive. People like to come to work because the office environment is comfortable. They respect each other at the company and show tolerance for those who are different from themselves.
Whereas at many mortgage companies it is common for resentments to build between people who earn different incomes, this is not the case at City Mortgage.
Jenny’s leadership has been instrumental in shaping the success of City Mortgage. Her philosophy stresses listening to employees and then determining how each employee can best contribute to the mission of the company. She makes a point of helping each person explore her or his own talents, and challenges each one to try new things.
At the annual holiday party, Jenny devised an interesting event that symbolizes her leadership style. She bought a large piece of colorful glass and had it cut into 25 pieces and handed out one piece to each person. Then she asked each employee to come forward with the piece of glass and briefly state what he or she liked about City Mortgage and how he or she had contributed to the company in the past year. After the statements were made, the pieces of glass were formed into a cut glass window that hangs in the front lobby of the office. The glass is a reminder of how each individual contributes his or her uniqueness to the overall purpose of the company.
Another characteristic of Jenny’s style is her fairness. She does not want to give anyone the impression that certain people have the inside track, and she goes to great lengths to prevent this from happening. For example, she avoids social lunches because she thinks they foster the perception of favoritism. Similarly, even though her best friend is one of the loan originators, she is seldom seen talking with her, and if she is, it is always about business matters.
Jenny also applies her fairness principle to how information is shared in the office. She does not want anyone to feel as if he or she is out of the loop, so she tries very hard to keep her employees informed on all the matters that could affect them. Much of this she does through her open-door office policy. Jenny does not have a special group of employees with whom she confides her concerns; rather, she shares openly with each of them.
Jenny is very committed to her work at City Mortgage. She works long hours and carries a beeper on the weekend. At this point in her career, her only concern is that she could be burning out.
- Based on the LMX model, how would you describe Jenny’s leadership?
- How do you think the employees at City Mortgage respond to Jenny?
- If you were asked to follow in Jenny’s footsteps, do you think you could or would want to manage City Mortgage with a similar style?
After his instructor's demise, Aristotle went to Atarneus in Asia Minor where he met with the ruler, Hermias. There he would be hitched to Hermias' received little girl Pythias. This may not appear to be significant to how it impacted authenticity in instruction, however if one somehow happened to consider it, in what manner can marriage not change the manner in which somebody supposes in a type of way? A couple of years passed, Hermias was killed because of insubordination and King Philip II of Macedon called upon Aristotle to come back to Stagira. It was here that he would turned into the coach of Alexander the Great, who was just thirteen years of age. This greatly affected history, as individuals know it. Aristotle showed him the learning of morals and legislative issues, just as numerous mysteries of reasoning in which numerous individuals likely would experience difficulty grasping. Alexander the Great benefitted from the learning passed on from Aristotle alongside Aristotle impacting the brain of the youthful sovereign to his advantage, and that is the manner by which history was influenced by this contact between these two individuals. When Alexander took the position of royalty, Aristotle came back to Athens and there opened a school of reasoning. Later he followed in the strides of his educator, Plato. He shaped a school, Lyceum, in an exercise center, where he gave customary guidance in logic. It was here that for a long time (335-322B.C.E.) as an educator at the Lyceum, he thought of the more prominent number of his compositions. He thought of "discoursed", which were compositions that Aristotle much of the time composed that are still perused today and were then by his understudies. When instructing at the Lyceum, Aristotle had a propensity for strolling about as he educated. It was regarding this that his devotees ended up referred to in later years as the peripatetics, signifying, "to stroll about." Besides, he made the few treatises on material science, power, etc, in which the work is a language more specialized than in the "discoursed". These works show the amount of an extraordinary impact they have, for example, the manner in which they affected Alexander whom later wound up known as Alexander the Great. They appear specifically how he prevailing with regards to uniting crafted by his antecedents in Greek rationality, and how he saved neither agonies nor cost in seeking after, either by and by or through others, his examinations in the domain of normal Phenomena. At the point when Alexander's passing ended up known at Athens, and the flare-up happened which prompted the Lamian war; Aristotle was obliged to partake in the general disagreeability of the Macedonians. The charge of profanity, which had been brought against Anaxagoras and Socrates, was presently, with even less reason, brought against him. He left the city, saying (as per numerous antiquated specialists) that he would not allow the Athenians to sin a third time against Philosophy. He took up his habitation at his nation house, at Chalcis, in Euboea, and there he kicked the bucket the next year, 322B.C.E. His passing was because of an illness from which he had since quite a while ago endured. The story that his demise was because of hemlock harming, just as the legend, saying they he devoted himself completely to the ocean are totally without chronicled establishment.>GET ANSWER