The specific research question: What DNA mutations are responsible for the mutant yellow body color
phenotype in yellow flies?
The Hypothesis: DNA sequence yellow mutation will look different from the DNA sequence of wild type fly
Prior to submitting your Lab Report 2full lab report, you will be handing in a rough draft of your Introduction,
including the following sections: Title Page, Introduction, and References. The purpose of this rough draft is to
help you begin writing and provide the opportunity to receive feedback from your TA/Instructor that will help you
with the final full draft of the report.Your Introduction rough draft should not exceed 2 typed double-spaced
pages (excluding the title page and reference section).
1)Title page: The current working title of your paper, your name, the date, and the coursetitle with section
number should be included.You are expected to generate your own title that is complete, accurate, and
descriptive of the work. This will be a working title that you may update upon receipt of feedback and
collection/analysis of data.
2)Introduction: Introduce the research question and purpose of experiments performed, providing sufficient
background for the reader to understand the project, including the major biological principles being examined.
Once defining the research question your experiments address, provide a brief overview of the experimental
model and approach(techniques) utilized.State the hypothesis, providing rationale(reason/justification) for the
hypothesis based on pertinent observations and information already known from the literature. State the
anticipated results given your hypothesis and discuss the rationale for expecting this outcome. Your goal is to
clearly and concisely write this information, ultimately in ~2 pages. Take a look at some of the research articles
you are using for background information to see examples of types and flow of information typical in an
introduction.Try to keep the length of the Introduction draft to no more than 2 pages.Any information from other
sources, including any figures you did not generate yourself, must be properly cited in-text/below the figure
AND in the reference section.
3)References: You should include any items you have used so far to write your draft. This may or may not yet
include the lab manual. You should use at least 2 scientific sources in your draft, with at least 4 total being
required for the final report(at least two of your sources being journal articles).Carefully follow the formatting
rules for in-text citations and reference section listings. Websites are typically not appropriate
sources.Reminder that you have some relevant, suggested review and primary research article references
provided in the course powerpoint slides!
here they are
These papers are also good resources for writing your lab report !
Massey and Wittkopp. 2016. The genetic basis of pigmentation differences within and between Drosophila
species. Cur Top Dev Bio. 119: 27-60
Drapeau. 2003. A novel hypothesis on the biochemical role of the Drosophila Yellow protein. Biochem Biophys
Res Com. 331: 1-2
Primary research articles:
Wittkopp et al. 2002. Reciprocal functions of the Drosophila yellow and ebony proteins in the development and
evolution of pigment patterns. Development 129: 1849-1858.
Riedel et al. 2011. Megalin-dependent yellow endocytosis restricts melanization in the Drosophila cuticle.
Development. 138: 149-158.
"Shout" by Edward Munch GuidesorSubmit my paper for investigation The_ScreamVisual workmanship as we probably am aware it today is totally not the same as what had been made before the twentieth century. Sensible delineations of the encompassing reality has surrendered its place for endeavors to pass on the craftsman's internal world straightforwardly through the assorted variety of shapes, hues, and methods for visual portrayal. Thus, a sensible inquiry emerges: by what method would it be advisable for one to assess bits of present day craftsmanship given that customary criteria of evaluation don't make a difference effectively right now? In contrast to conventional craftsmanship, where one can make decisions about the scene, a craftsman's aptitudes, and sythesis, present day workmanship ought to be assessed in a marginally extraordinary way. Despite the fact that there are various imaginative laws and rules, any evaluation made about a bit of workmanship stays emotional; I trust one can without much of a stretch clarify why somebody prefers a specific bit of craftsmanship, yet won't have the option to convince the individuals who can't help contradicting them or have no creative taste. Thinking about this, let us allude to "Shout"— a well known artwork by Edward Munch. Despite the fact that it was painted over 110 years prior, it despite everything makes an ideal case of present day craftsmanship. By and by, I normally assess works of art by their clarity, quality of aesthetic methods, (for example, sythesis, shading, etc), and the maker's capacity to speak with the crowd through a canvas. Regardless of its expressionistic, contorted shapes and upsetting hues (which will be talked about later) "Shout" is as yet a sensible work of art, acted in an expressionist way. Its scene contains no conceptual images or figures; its components are obviously unmistakable and don't require deciphering, which demonstrates that the artwork is sensible. Consequently, regarding cognizance, Munch's "Shout" can be moderately effectively seen by all individuals, and subsequently is open for contemplated banters about its imaginative worth. It is useful for any bit of workmanship, as individuals ought to have the option to talk about what they see; for instance, on account of "The Black Square" by Malevich (which is likewise a huge and representative artwork) it is significantly more hard for individuals to comprehend the aesthetic estimation of what they are appeared (RealArtsHistory). By his work of art, Munch totally satisfied the possibility of expressionism: passing on the emotions through the canvas. Compositional methods utilized by the craftsman make an inclination that a figure in the middle is pierced and persecuted by the encompassing nature, and simultaneously, the view looks precarious; converging askew lines of the scaffold and the stream, just as the looming skies, make pressure; directly in its inside, a figure shouting with dismay looks squashed by the intensity of nature and vulnerability; even regardless of that the figure isn't the only one (the two individuals standing close by) the artistic creation is drenched with the sentiment of depression and dejection: because of the utilization of a marginally contorted point of view, Munch made an unbridgeable separation between the focal figure and individuals who witness this fine art. These impressions are controlled by upsetting hues utilized by the craftsman, and stunning lines that make the scene resemble a daydream. The image unquestionably influences anyone who takes a gander at it. "Shout" was made in a way that was run of the mill for Edward Munch, however a few highlights right now overstated. Dainty dim figures with depressed eyes, upsetting faint hues, the vibe of dejection, summed up landscape—these were Munch's ordinary masterful procedures, and every one of them were typified in "Shout." Thus, this composition can be known as a total exemplification of Munch's innovative strategy; this technique, be that as it may, was enlivened by Munch's serious mental issue. The craftsman experienced hyper burdensome psychosis, and his works of art are a demonstration of his mental condition and show individuals how profound his sufferings were (AllBios). "Shout" by Edward Munch is an ideal case of present day workmanship. In spite of the fact that it had been painted right around a century back, it despite everything stays present day, both on account of the all inclusive character of existential issues raised by it, and by the aesthetic methods utilized. Crunch made a sincerely persuasive, ground-breaking bit of craftsmanship; the aesthetic methods he utilized totally pass on the sentiments of depression and forlornness, and the entirety of Munch's sad character is by all accounts communicated right now. References Brilliant, Lesley. "The Tragic Genius of Edward Munch." AllBios. N.p., 11 Oct. 2010. Web. 28 Feb. 2014. "Genuine History of Modern Arts." RealArtsHistory. N.p., 2 June 2009. Web. 27 Feb. 2014.>GET ANSWER