Sources Found in Shapiro Library

by | Mar 18, 2024 | business

List credible and relevant sources you found in the Shapiro Library during your independent research.

Include two sources that you find from your independent research.
Include the link to both sources. Alternatively, you can practice using attribution conventions to cite sources by writing a citation for each source using APA or MLA conventions. While you will not be graded on the accuracy of this citation, this is a great opportunity to practice citing sources using the citation format you chose to use in this course. Remember, you will need to use the format you chose in Module One for the duration of the course, including all assignments and the project.
Evaluate your sources.

Describe how each source supports your topic and how it can help answer your research question.
Discuss why you trust the credibility of your sources and/or what questions or doubts you have about the information presented in your sources.
Discuss how you think your audience will view the credibility of your sources for your argument.
Explain the bias found in each source.

Explain how the bias or lack of bias in each source impacts your argument.
Explain how you think your audience will respond to the bias or lack of bias in each source.
Use these links

Can four-day work week save economies?

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-23/the-4-day-work-week-s-latest-convert-is-amc-ceo-adam-aron

 

Sample solution

Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell. 

In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.


This question has been answered

God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.

Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.

To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.

 

References

Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.

Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.

Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.

Sample Answer

Sample Answer

 

Sources Found in Shapiro Library:

1. Source 1:

– Title: “Corporate Governance and Ethics: An Aristotelian Perspective”
– Author: Alejo José G. Sison
– Link: Corporate Governance and Ethics
– Evaluation:- Support for Topic: This source provides insights into the relationship between corporate governance and ethics, which is crucial for understanding the ethical lapses that led to the Wirecard scandal.
– Credibility: The source is published in a reputable academic journal, indicating that it has undergone peer review, enhancing its credibility.
– Bias: The author’s perspective may lean towards a philosophical or ethical viewpoint, which could influence the interpretation of corporate governance practices.

2. Source 2:

– Title: “Whistleblowing and Organizational Culture: How Can Leaders Create a Speak-Up Culture?”
– Author: Linda J. Skitka and Liane R. Dahlen
– Link: Whistleblowing and Organizational Culture
– Evaluation:- Support for Topic: This source delves into the importance of organizational culture in promoting whistleblowing, which is relevant to understanding why unethical behavior went unchecked at Wirecard.
– Credibility: Published by the American Psychological Association, this source is considered reliable due to its scholarly nature and adherence to academic standards.
– Bias: The authors may have a psychological perspective on organizational behavior, potentially influencing their analysis of how leaders can foster a speak-up culture.

Independent Research Sources:

1. Source 3:

– Title: “The Role of Corporate Culture in Business Ethics”
– Author: David Rönnegard
– Link: Corporate Culture in Business Ethics
– Evaluation:- Support for Topic: This source explores the impact of corporate culture on business ethics, providing valuable insights into how organizational culture can shape ethical conduct within companies like Wirecard.
– Credibility: The source is a doctoral thesis, indicating in-depth research on the subject matter, enhancing its credibility.
– Bias: The author’s research background may influence the emphasis on specific aspects of corporate culture relevant to business ethics.

2. Source 4:

– Title: “Corporate Governance and Ethical Behavior: A Holistic Approach for the Future”
– Author: Maria Aluchna
– Link: Corporate Governance and Ethical Behavior
– Evaluation:- Support for Topic: This source offers a comprehensive view of the relationship between corporate governance and ethical behavior, which is essential for understanding the dynamics that led to the Wirecard scandal.
– Credibility: The source is available on ResearchGate, a platform known for hosting academic research, indicating a level of credibility.
– Bias: The author’s perspective on a holistic approach may introduce specific recommendations that align with certain ethical frameworks.

Audience Perception:

– The audience is likely to view the sources from academic journals and scholarly platforms as credible due to their rigorous review processes and scholarly nature.
– The bias present in the sources, such as philosophical or psychological perspectives, may influence how the audience interprets the information presented. Acknowledging these biases can help provide a more nuanced understanding of the topic.

Impact on Argument:

– The bias or lack thereof in each source can impact the argument by shaping the interpretation of concepts such as corporate governance, ethics, and organizational culture.
– Recognizing and addressing biases within the sources can help present a well-rounded argument that considers various viewpoints and perspectives.

In conclusion, by critically evaluating the sources found in Shapiro Library and through independent research, it is possible to construct a well-supported argument that delves into the ethical dimensions of the Wirecard scandal. Understanding the nuances of corporate governance, ethics, and organizational culture is crucial for dissecting the factors that contributed to the downfall of Wirecard AG.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer