In about 2,500 words, advance and defend a hypothesis about media ethics and technology. In other words, state a specific claim or point of view and back it up. Take a basic idea – such as, “the increasing ability to sort and manipulate information changes the nature of that information, and justifies making some data that used to be considered ‘public’ more private” – and lead it through several steps
Abstract
Introduction.
Examples to back up the introduction.
Examination of historical and philosophical precedent, citing a variety of sources and integrating those sources into your discussion.
Examination of the current issue, related to the precedent. Use current examples.
Your view of the current issue.
Your argument and analysis. Be sure to refute competing claims.
Conclusion and implications for the future.
The options are almost limitless. You might argue that the federal government should re-implement the Fairness Doctrine, or that bloggers should be required to disclose their names, or that news organizations should implement more precise rules on use of anonymous sources, or that the availability of instant information makes censorship obsolete and no (or very few) documents should be classified (think: WikiLeaks). Privacy, of course, offers endless permutations useful for you in choosing a topic.
Be sure to integrate technological change into the argument. The paper doesn’t have to be about technology, but it must include technology’s effect as part of the discussion.
Sample solution
Dante Alighieri played a critical role in the literature world through his poem Divine Comedy that was written in the 14th century. The poem contains Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso. The Inferno is a description of the nine circles of torment that are found on the earth. It depicts the realms of the people that have gone against the spiritual values and who, instead, have chosen bestial appetite, violence, or fraud and malice. The nine circles of hell are limbo, lust, gluttony, greed and wrath. Others are heresy, violence, fraud, and treachery. The purpose of this paper is to examine the Dante’s Inferno in the perspective of its portrayal of God’s image and the justification of hell.
In this epic poem, God is portrayed as a super being guilty of multiple weaknesses including being egotistic, unjust, and hypocritical. Dante, in this poem, depicts God as being more human than divine by challenging God’s omnipotence. Additionally, the manner in which Dante describes Hell is in full contradiction to the morals of God as written in the Bible. When god arranges Hell to flatter Himself, He commits egotism, a sin that is common among human beings (Cheney, 2016). The weakness is depicted in Limbo and on the Gate of Hell where, for instance, God sends those who do not worship Him to Hell. This implies that failure to worship Him is a sin.
God is also depicted as lacking justice in His actions thus removing the godly image. The injustice is portrayed by the manner in which the sodomites and opportunists are treated. The opportunists are subjected to banner chasing in their lives after death followed by being stung by insects and maggots. They are known to having done neither good nor bad during their lifetimes and, therefore, justice could have demanded that they be granted a neutral punishment having lived a neutral life. The sodomites are also punished unfairly by God when Brunetto Lattini is condemned to hell despite being a good leader (Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). While he commited sodomy, God chooses to ignore all the other good deeds that Brunetto did.
Finally, God is also portrayed as being hypocritical in His actions, a sin that further diminishes His godliness and makes Him more human. A case in point is when God condemns the sin of egotism and goes ahead to commit it repeatedly. Proverbs 29:23 states that “arrogance will bring your downfall, but if you are humble, you will be respected.” When Slattery condemns Dante’s human state as being weak, doubtful, and limited, he is proving God’s hypocrisy because He is also human (Verdicchio, 2015). The actions of God in Hell as portrayed by Dante are inconsistent with the Biblical literature. Both Dante and God are prone to making mistakes, something common among human beings thus making God more human.
To wrap it up, Dante portrays God is more human since He commits the same sins that humans commit: egotism, hypocrisy, and injustice. Hell is justified as being a destination for victims of the mistakes committed by God. The Hell is presented as being a totally different place as compared to what is written about it in the Bible. As a result, reading through the text gives an image of God who is prone to the very mistakes common to humans thus ripping Him off His lofty status of divine and, instead, making Him a mere human. Whether or not Dante did it intentionally is subject to debate but one thing is clear in the poem: the misconstrued notion of God is revealed to future generations.
References
Babor, T. F., McGovern, T., & Robaina, K. (2017). Dante’s inferno: Seven deadly sins in scientific publishing and how to avoid them. Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed, 267.
Cheney, L. D. G. (2016). Illustrations for Dante’s Inferno: A Comparative Study of Sandro Botticelli, Giovanni Stradano, and Federico Zuccaro. Cultural and Religious Studies, 4(8), 487.
Verdicchio, M. (2015). Irony and Desire in Dante’s” Inferno” 27. Italica, 285-297.
Sample Answer
Sample Answer
Title: The Increasing Ability to Sort and Manipulate Information: A Challenge to Media Ethics
Abstract
This essay explores the evolving landscape of media ethics in the context of technological advancements that enable the sorting and manipulation of information. It argues that these capabilities have changed the nature of information, justifying the need for increased privacy and reevaluation of traditional notions of public data. By examining historical and philosophical precedents, current examples, and the implications for the future, this essay aims to shed light on the complex relationship between media ethics and technology.
Introduction
With the rapid advancements in technology, the ability to sort and manipulate information has become increasingly powerful. This has profound implications for media ethics, as the very nature of information is being transformed. In this essay, we will explore how this changing landscape challenges traditional notions of public data and justifies the need for increased privacy. By examining historical and philosophical precedents, current examples, and the implications for the future, we will argue that media ethics must adapt to the evolving technological capabilities.
Examples to Back Up the Introduction
To illustrate the impact of sorting and manipulating information, let us consider the rise of social media platforms. These platforms collect vast amounts of personal data from their users, ranging from demographics to browsing habits. This data is then used to create personalized content and advertisements, tailored specifically to individuals based on their interests and preferences. While this may enhance user experience, it raises concerns about privacy and the ethical implications of using personal data for targeted marketing.
Another example can be found in the field of journalism. News organizations now have access to extensive databases and algorithms that allow them to sort through large volumes of information quickly. While this enables journalists to uncover stories that would have otherwise gone unnoticed, it also raises questions about data manipulation and bias. The ability to selectively choose which information to present can shape public opinion and influence societal discourse.
Examination of Historical and Philosophical Precedent
To understand the impact of technology on media ethics, it is crucial to examine historical and philosophical precedents. Throughout history, societies have grappled with balancing the values of transparency and privacy. The advent of the printing press in the 15th century challenged existing norms as it allowed for the dissemination of information on a mass scale. This led to debates about censorship, accountability, and the responsibility of those who control the flow of information.
Philosophers such as John Stuart Mill argued for the importance of free expression in promoting individual liberty and societal progress. However, they also recognized that certain limitations may be necessary to protect privacy and prevent harm. These debates provide a foundation for understanding the ethical challenges posed by technological advancements in media.
Examination of the Current Issue
The current issue at hand is how the increasing ability to sort and manipulate information affects media ethics. One notable example is the rise of algorithmic news curation. Platforms like Google News and Facebook’s News Feed utilize algorithms to personalize news content for users. While this may seem convenient, it raises concerns about filter bubbles and echo chambers, where users are only exposed to information that aligns with their existing beliefs.
Furthermore, the collection and analysis of personal data by tech giants have come under scrutiny due to potential privacy breaches. The Cambridge Analytica scandal revealed how personal data collected from Facebook was used to influence political campaigns. Such incidents highlight the need for stricter regulations and ethical guidelines surrounding data usage in media.
My View of the Current Issue
In light of these examples and considerations, I believe that the increasing ability to sort and manipulate information necessitates a reevaluation of traditional notions of public data. While transparency remains crucial for a functioning democracy, there are ethical limits to how much personal information should be readily accessible. Individuals have a right to privacy, and new technologies should be accompanied by safeguards that protect personal data from unethical use.
Argument and Analysis
One argument against increased privacy measures is that they impede transparency and hinder accountability. However, it is essential to strike a balance between transparency and privacy. While some information should remain public for accountability purposes, individuals should have control over their personal data, especially in an era where technology allows for unprecedented surveillance.
Moreover, media organizations have a responsibility to ensure unbiased reporting and avoid manipulation. The availability of instant information does not render censorship obsolete; instead, it necessitates responsible journalism. News organizations should implement more precise rules on the use of anonymous sources, disclose conflicts of interest, and strive for a diversity of perspectives to counteract bias.
Conclusion and Implications for the Future
The increasing ability to sort and manipulate information poses both challenges and opportunities for media ethics. It is imperative for society to adapt its ethical frameworks to address these changes effectively. Striking a balance between transparency and privacy, ensuring responsible journalism, and implementing stricter regulations on data usage are essential steps toward an ethical media landscape.
As technology continues to evolve rapidly, media ethics must keep pace with these advancements. By critically examining historical precedents, engaging with philosophical debates, and analyzing current examples, we can navigate this complex terrain with ethical integrity. Only through open dialogue and thoughtful consideration can we ensure that technology enhances rather than undermines our shared values in the realm of media ethics.
